Prediction of Gary Donnelly vs Jim Pugh Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Donnelly vs J. Pugh

Gary Donnelly

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'4" (193 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Jim Pugh

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'4" (193 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Donnelly 1 - 1 Pugh

They have played 4 sets in total, with Gary Donnelly winning 2 and Jim Pugh winning 2. The last match between Jim Pugh and Gary Donnelly was at the Schenectady, 20-07-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jim Pugh getting the victory 7-6 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Donnelly	1
Pugh	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Schenectady(07-20-87)

Stats

Jim Pugh

Gary Donnelly

(R2) Tokyo Outdoor(10-13-86)

Stats

Gary Donnelly

Jim Pugh

G. Donnelly vs J. Pugh H2H Profile

G. Donnelly	Stats	J. Pugh
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
41.54% (27-38)	Career Total W/L	51.34% (115-109)
1	Hard	1
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Donnelly vs J. Pugh Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gary Donnelly has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jim Pugh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gary Donnelly, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jim Pugh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Gary Donnelly has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jim Pugh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Gary Donnelly has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jim Pugh winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Gary Donnelly has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 22/23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Jim Pugh has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 49% (W/L 10/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 55/57).
Player level: In the last year, Gary Donnelly has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jim Pugh has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gary Donnelly winning 1 times and Jim Pugh being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gary Donnelly winning 2 and Jim Pugh winning 2.
The last match between Gary Donnelly and Jim Pugh was at the Schenectady, 20-07-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jim Pugh getting the victory 7-6 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gary Donnelly has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jim Pugh has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gary Donnelly has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jim Pugh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Gary Donnelly has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jim Pugh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Gary Donnelly vs Jim Pugh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Donnelly vs J. Pugh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Donnelly	Stats	J. Pugh
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
24	Games Won	19
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Donnelly Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Luis Potosi CH - 20-03-1989
R3 Luis HerreraL. Herrera	L	6-4 4-6 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 12-09-1988
R3 Mike De PalmerM. De	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 18-07-1988
QF David NainkinD. Nainkin	L	6-2 4-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Grant StaffordG. Stafford	W	7-5 4-6 6-3	Stats
R3 Marius BarnardM. Barnard	W	6-4 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Pugh Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven - 14-08-1995
R1 Mats WilanderM. Wilander	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Los Angeles - 31-07-1995
R1 Mark PhilippoussisM. Philippoussis	L	7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(7)	Stats
Newport - 06-07-1992
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
U.S. Open - 26-08-1991
R1 Grant StaffordG. Stafford	L	6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3	Stats
Indianapolis - 12-08-1991
R2 Jim CourierJ. Courier	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

G. Donnelly vs J. Pugh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Donnelly	Stats	J. Pugh
41.54% (27/38)	YTD Win/Loss	51.34% (115/109)
45.61% (78/93)	Sets Win/Loss	50.26% (293/290)
48.71% (830/874)	Games Win/Loss	50.28% (2813/2782)
48.89% (22/23)	Hard Win/Loss	49.11% (55/57)
0.00% (0/5)	Clay Win/Loss	53.85% (35/30)
55.56% (5/4)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.72% (15/14)
0.00% (0/6)	Grass Win/Loss	55.56% (10/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
364.86	Average Opponent Rank	225.13
44.44% (4/5)	Slam W/L	36.67% (11/19)
0.00% (0/4)	Masters W/L	40.00% (10/15)
28.13% (9/23)	Main Tour W/L	51.20% (64/61)
70.00% (14/6)	Challenger W/L	68.18% (30/14)
42% (23/55)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (103/190)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	35% (12/34)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (3/6)
35% (8/23)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (46/86)
77% (30/23)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (113/91)
23% (30/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (113/22)
11% (35/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (111/24)